Prophylaxis with Teicoplanin and Cefuroxime Reduces the Rate of Prosthetic Joint Infection after Primary Arthroplasty
Cefuroxime
Teicoplanin
Discontinuation
DOI:
10.1128/aac.03949-14
Publication Date:
2014-11-18T05:07:10Z
AUTHORS (10)
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to compare the prosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate after total arthroplasty in two consecutive periods treatment with different antibiotic prophylaxes: cefuroxime versus plus teicoplanin. We retrospectively reviewed 1,896 patients who underwent hip or knee between March 2010 and February 2013. From August 2011, received 1.5 g during induction anesthesia another 2 h later (the C group). September 800 mg teicoplanin added CT Throughout period studied, there were no variations pre- postoperative protocols. Univariate multivariate analyses performed evaluate independent predictors PJI. There 995 (55.7%) group 791 (44.3%) group. Patients had a significantly lower PJI than (1.26% 3.51%, P = 0.002). infections due Staphylococcus aureus (0% 1.6% group, < 0.001). A stepwise forward Cox regression model identified male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.09 7.18), body mass index ≥35 kg/m (HR, 2.93; CI, 1.37 6.27), presence lung disease 2.46; 1.17 5.15), red blood cell transfusion 3.70; 1.89 7.23) be variables associated higher risk addition 0.35; 0.17 0.74). In conclusion, primary significant reduction global caused by Gram-positive bacteria.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (30)
CITATIONS (43)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....