Do High-Frequency Volatility Methods Improve the Accuracies of Risk Forecasts? Evidence from Stock Indexes and Portfolio
Downside risk
Stock (firearms)
Realized variance
DOI:
10.1142/s0219477521500322
Publication Date:
2020-12-31T07:19:03Z
AUTHORS (4)
ABSTRACT
Though the high-frequency volatility approaches are increasingly introduced to forecast financial risk in recent years, whether they can improve accuracies of forecasts remains controversial. This paper compares forecasting abilities four pairs low- and models, by calculating evaluating downside upside value-at-risk expected shortfall stock indexes portfolio. The empirical results show that, first, all models well filter serial dependence extremes, conditional standard deviation obtained from GARCH model performs best filtering dependence. Secondly, backtesting index portfolio consistent. More specifically, traditional low-frequency produce more accurate most cases, whereas methods also manifest some advantages extreme forecasting.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (47)
CITATIONS (0)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....