Unsupervised Deep Learning for Blood–Brain Barrier Leakage Detection in Diffuse Glioma Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI
DOI:
10.1148/ryai.240507
Publication Date:
2025-04-02T13:46:16Z
AUTHORS (9)
ABSTRACT
“Just Accepted” papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content. Purpose To develop an unsupervised deep learning framework for generalizable blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage detection using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, without requiring pharmacokinetic (PK) models and arterial input function (AIF) estimation. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included data from patients who underwent DCE MRI between April 2010 and December 2020. An autoencoder-based anomaly detection (AEAD) identified 1D voxel-wise time-series abnormal signals through reconstruction residuals, separating them into residual leakage signals (RLS) and residual vascular signals (RVS). The RLS maps were evaluated and compared with the volume transfer constant ( Ktrans) using the structural similarity index (SSIM) and correlation coefficient ( r). Generalizability was tested on subsampled data, and IDH status classification performance was assessed using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Results A total of 274 patients were included (164 male; mean age 54.23 ± [SD] 14.66 years). RLS showed high structural similarity (SSIM = 0.91 ± 0.02) and correlation ( r = 0.56, P < .001) with Ktrans. On subsampled data, RLS maps showed better correlation with RLS values from original data (0.89 versus 0.72, P < .001), higher PSNR (33.09 dB versus 28.94 dB, P < .001), and higher SSIM (0.92 versus 0.87, P < .001) compared with Ktrans maps. RLS maps also outperformed Ktrans maps in predicting IDH mutation status (AUC = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.83–0.91] versus 0.81 [95% CI: 0.76–0.85], P = .02). Conclusion The unsupervised framework effectively detected blood-brain barrier leakage without PK models and AIF. ©RSNA, 2025
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (0)
CITATIONS (0)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....