Significance of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (an acute phase protein) in monitoring critically ill patients

• DOI: 10.1186/cc2386
• Publication Date: 2003-10-07T06:21:03Z
• Authors: Miroslav Prucha; Ivan Herold; Roman Zazula; Ladislava Dubska; Miroslav Dostal; Thomas Hildebrand; Josef Hyanek
• Keywords: Adult; Calcitonin; Male; Membrane Glycoproteins; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Shock, Septic; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; 3. Good health; 03 medical and health sciences; C-Reactive Protein; 0302 clinical medicine; Sepsis; Humans; Female; Prospective Studies; Protein Precursors; Carrier Proteins; APACHE; Acute-Phase Proteins; Aged

Abstract Introduction The present study was conducted to assess the value of serum concentration of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis and septic shock with respect to its ability to differentiate between infectious and noninfectious etiologies in SIRS and to predict prognosis.

Methods This prospective cohort study was conducted in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit. Sixty-eight patients, admitted consecutively to the intensive care unit and who met criteria for SIRS, sepsis or septic shock were included. Serum LBP was measured using an immunochemiluminiscence assay.

Results Serum levels of LBP were significantly increased in patients with SIRS (n = 40; median 30.6 μg/ml, range 9.2–79.5 μg/ml), sepsis (n = 19; median 37.1 μg/ml, range 11.8–76.2 μg/ml) and septic shock (n = 9; median 59.7 μg/ml, range 31.1–105 μg/ml), as compared with levels in the healthy volunteers (5.1 ± 2.2 μg/ml; P < 0.0001). Serum LBP at study entry was statistically significantly lower in patients with SIRS than in those with septic shock (P < 0.014); no statistically significant difference existed between patients with SIRS and those with sepsis (P = 0.61). Specificity and sensitivity of an LBP concentration of 29.8 μg/ml to distinguish between infectious and noninfectious etiologies for SIRS were 50% and 74.2%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in LBP concentration between survivors and nonsurvivors in both groups of patients. Furthermore, in septic patients the LBP response appeared to exhibit a decreased magnitude.

Conclusion LBP is a nonspecific marker of the acute phase response and cannot be used as a diagnostic tool for differentiating between infectious and noninfectious etiologies of SIRS.