The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Pregnancy Rate
Fallopian Tubes/diagnostic imaging
Pain, Procedural
Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy)
Hysterosalpingography/adverse effects
Study Protocol
Infertility, Female/diagnostic imaging
0302 clinical medicine
Pregnancy
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Fallopian Tube Diseases/complications
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Ultrasonography
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Tubal patency testing
R
HEALTH SURVEY
Fallopian Tube Diseases
3. Good health
Laparoscopy/adverse effects
Randomized controlled trial
Fertility work-up
Research Design
Ongoing pregnancy
Female
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Pain, Procedural/etiology
Infertility, Female
Live Birth
Adult
subfertility
Adolescent
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
610
R Medicine
Cost effectiveness
VALIDATION
Hysterosalpingography (HSG)
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
Ovulation Induction
SF-36
616
Journal Article
Humans
ongoing pregnancy
cost-effectiveness
hysterosalpingography (HSG)
Fallopian Tubes
Abortion, Spontaneous/etiology
Subfertility
Gynecology and obstetrics
Ultrasonography/adverse effects
Hysterosalpingography
Abortion, Spontaneous
Budget impact
budget impact
Reproductive Medicine
randomized controlled trial
RG1-991
Cost-effectiveness
Laparoscopy
DOI:
10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6
Publication Date:
2018-05-09T00:56:51Z
AUTHORS (36)
ABSTRACT
Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it is less expensive and more patient friendly. HyFoSy would be an acceptable alternative for HSG, provided it has similar effectiveness in terms of patient outcomes.We aim to compare the effectiveness and costs of management guided by HyFoSy or by HSG. Consenting women will undergo tubal testing by both HyFoSy and HSG in a randomized order during fertility work-up. The study group will consist of 1163 subfertile women between 18 and 41 years old who are scheduled for tubal patency testing during their fertility work-up. Women with anovulatory cycles not responding to ovulation induction, endometriosis, severe male subfertility or a known contrast (iodine) allergy will be excluded. We anticipate that 7 % (N = 82) of the participants will have discordant test results for HyFoSy and HSG. These participants will be randomly allocated to either a management strategy based on HyFoSy or a management strategy based on HSG, resulting in either a diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation or a strategy that assumes tubal patency (intrauterine insemination or expectant management). The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth within 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes are patient pain scores, time to pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate and number of additional treatments. Costs will be estimated by counting resource use and calculating unit prices.This trial will compare the effectiveness and costs of HyFoSy versus HSG in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women.Dutch Trial Register (NTR 4746, http://www.trialregister.nl ). Date of registration: 19 August 2014.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (15)
CITATIONS (22)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....