“Kunika women are always sick”: views from community focus groups on short birth interval (kunika) in Bauchi state, northern Nigeria

• DOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-00970-2
• Publication Date: 2020-05-24T10:02:33Z
• Authors: Umaira Ansari; Juan Pimentel; Khalid Omer; Yagana Gidado; Muhd Chadi Baba; Neil Andersson; Anne Cockcroft
• Keywords: Male; Community; CONTRACEPTION; 0302 clinical medicine; 5. Gender equality; Pregnancy; Child; Prenatal Care; Focus Groups; Middle Aged; Focus groups; 16. Peace & justice; FAMILY PLANNING; 3. Good health; PREGNANCY; Female; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270; ISLAM; Research Article; Adult; Community-Based Participatory Research; SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH; Adolescent; POLYGAMY; Nigeria; WOMEN'S HEALTH; Young Adult; 03 medical and health sciences; Birth Intervals; Northern Nigeria; RURAL POVERTY; Humans; Child spacing; SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; NIGERIA; SOUTH OF SAHARA; CHILD SPACING; Gynecology and obstetrics; PATRIARCHY; Short birth interval; Hausa; Socioeconomic Factors; RG1-991; Women's Health; GENDER ROLES

Abstract Background In Northern Nigeria, short birth interval is common. The word kunika in the Hausa language describes a woman becoming pregnant before weaning her last child. A sizeable literature confirms an association between short birth interval and adverse perinatal and maternal health outcomes. Yet there are few reported studies about how people view short birth interval and its consequences. In support of culturally safe child spacing in Bauchi State, in North East Nigeria, we explored local perspectives about kunika and its consequences.

Methods A qualitative descriptive study included 12 gender-segregated focus groups facilitated by local men and women in six communities from the Toro Local Government Area in Bauchi State. Facilitators conducted the groups in the Hausa language and translated the reports of the discussions into English. After an inductive thematic analysis, the local research team reviewed and agreed the themes in a member-checking exercise.

Results Some 49 women and 48 men participated in the 12 focus groups, with an average of eight people in each group. All participants were married with ages ranging from 15 to 45 years. They explained their understanding of kunika, often in terms of pregnancy while breastfeeding. They described many disadvantages of kunika, including health complications for the mother and children, economic consequences, and adverse impact on men’s health and family dynamics. The groups concluded that some people still practise kunika, either intentionally (for example, in order to increase family size or because of competition between co-wives) or unintentionally (for example, because of frequent unprotected sex), and explained the roles of men and women in this.

Conclusion Men and women in our study had a clear understanding of the concept of kunika. They recognized many adverse consequences of kunika beyond the narrow health concerns reported in quantitative studies. Their highlighted impacts of kunika on men’s wellbeing can inform initiatives promoting the role of men in addressing kunika.