Comparison of the effects of using feedback devices for training or simulated cardiopulmonary arrest

• DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02669-z
• Publication Date: 2024-03-27T12:02:14Z
• Authors: Jinghao Jiang; Jinghuang Yan; Dongai Yao; Jinsong Xiao; Rongtao Chen; Yan Zhao; Xiaoqing Jin
• Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; RD1-811; Research; Manikins; Simulated cardiopulmonary arrest; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Feedback; Heart Arrest; Audiovisual feedback; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Anesthesiology; Training; Humans; Chest compression; Surgery; RD78.3-87.3; Prospective Studies

Abstract Background High-quality chest compression is essential for successful cardiac arrest resuscitation. cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can effectively improve the survival rate of patients with arrest. However, bystanders untrained in may provide inadequate compressions. Previous studies have shown that use feedback devices training alone or simulated This study aims to determine whether using an audiovisual (AVF) device during CPR a (CA) scenario would be more effective improving quality compressions (CC). Methods We prospective, randomized, 2 × factorial design trial. A total 160 participants from Wuhan University and senior clinical medicine undergraduates who had not participated any before no actual experience are recruited. Each participant randomized 1 4 permutations, including AVF vs. CA. Main outcomes measures depth, percentage CCs correct depth (5–6 cm), CCs, (100–120 cpm). Results The CA resulted improved CC quality. In without device, average adequate 5.1 cm, 5.0 cm 55.5%, 56.3%, respectively, which higher than those (4.5 4.7 32.8%, 33.6%). ( p = 0.011, 0.000, both < 0.05).Compared 112.3 cpm, 111.2 cpm 79.4%, 83.1%, respectively. 112.4 110.3 71.5%, 68.5%, 0.567 > 0.05, 0.017 0.05)Although group D slightly lower C, suitable frequency still device. Conclusion Using training.