Ofatumumab Versus Rituximab Salvage Chemoimmunotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The ORCHARRD Study
DHAP
Chemoimmunotherapy
Ofatumumab
Autologous stem-cell transplantation
Salvage therapy
Progression-free survival
DOI:
10.1200/jco.2016.69.0198
Publication Date:
2017-02-24T11:56:50Z
AUTHORS (18)
ABSTRACT
Purpose We compared the efficacy of ofatumumab (O) versus rituximab (R) in combination with cisplatin, cytarabine, and dexamethasone (DHAP) salvage treatment, followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) patients relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients Methods CD20+ DLBCL age ≥ 18 years who had experienced their first relapse were to first-line R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone)-like treatment randomly assigned between three cycles R-DHAP O-DHAP. Either O 1,000 mg R 375 mg/m2 was administered for a total four infusions (days 1 8 cycle 1; day 2 3 DHAP). response after two received third cycle, high-dose therapy ASCT. Primary end point progression-free survival (PFS), failure achieve included as an event. Results Between March 2010 December 2013, 447 assigned. Median 57 (range, 83 years); 17% 65 years; 63% stage III IV disease; 71% did not complete (CR) experience < year on R-CHOP. Response rate O-DHAP 38% (CR, 15%) 42% 22%) R-DHAP. ASCT protocol completed 74 (33%) arm (37%) arm. PFS, event-free survival, overall significantly different R-DHAP: PFS at 24% 26% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.89 1.42; P = .33); 16% 18% (HR, 1.10; .35); 41% 0.90; .38). Positron emission tomography negativity before highly predictive superior outcome. Conclusion No difference found DLBCL.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (25)
CITATIONS (187)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....