Prognostic significance of PSA in the outcomes of patients with high risk localized prostate cancer.
DOI:
10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.347
Publication Date:
2025-02-18T14:33:57Z
AUTHORS (8)
ABSTRACT
347
Background:
Patients diagnosed with localized high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma (LHRPC) with high Gleason scores (8-10) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ≤ 4 may experience an altered clinical course. In these patients, low PSA levels may reflect cellular dedifferentiation, indicating more aggressive tumor behavior despite appearing to have a low disease burden. We aim to investigate the impact of PSA levels in patients with LHRPC to better understand prognosis and optimize treatment strategies.
Methods:
We included patients diagnosed with LHRPC based on TNM stage (T1-T4, N0, M0) and Gleason 8–10 from 2004 to 2020, using data from the National Cancer Database. We stratified patients based on PSA levels (≤4 and >4 ng/dl) and treatment approaches. We utilized Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard model to study survival outcomes in patients with LHRPC.
Results:
We included 160,971 patients diagnosed with LHRPC, of which 86.69% (139,546) had PSA >4 ng/dl, while only 13.31% (21,425) had PSA ≤4 ng/dl. Our cohort had 69.55% (111,953) patients aged ≥ 65 years and 30.45% (49,018) aged < 65 years. Regarding race, the cohort was predominantly white, comprising 81.69% (131,497), followed by black at 14.47% (23,292), and other racial categories at 3.84% (6,182). In our cohort 34.43% (55,425) underwent surgery only (S), 9.62% (15,484) received radiation therapy only (RT), 46.81% (75,350) had radiation therapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy (RT + ADT), and 9.14% (14,712) received androgen deprivation therapy only (ADT). In our multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis, LHRPC patients with PSA >4 ng/dL had a 7% (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90–0.95; p<0.001) decreased risk of death compared to those with PSA ≤4 ng/dL.
Conclusions:
In our study, LHRPC patients with PSA ≤4 ng/dL had poorer survival outcomes after adjusting for the treatment approach, race, age category, income, insurance status, facility type, and location. Further research is required to explore potential biological differences in patients with low PSA-secreting LHRPC.
Cox proportional hazard analysis in patients with LHRPC, GS 8-10.
Categories
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
P-value
Treatment type: Surgery only
reference
RT only
2.27 (2.19, 2.36)
<0.001
RT + ADT
2.37 (2.30, 2.44)
<0.001
ADT only
5.68 (5.49, 5.87)
<0.001
Charlson Deyson score : 0
reference
>=1
1.43 (1.40, 1.46)
<0.001
Facility type : Academic
reference
Non-Academic
1.20 (1.17, 1.23)
<0.001
PSA ≤ 4 ng/dl
reference
PSA > 4 ng/dl
0.93 (0.90, 0.95)
<0.001
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (0)
CITATIONS (0)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....