Evidence of Experimental Bias in the Life Sciences: Why We Need Blind Data Recording
Reporting bias
Response bias
Confirmation bias
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.1002190
Publication Date:
2015-07-08T17:52:18Z
AUTHORS (4)
ABSTRACT
Observer bias and other "experimenter effects" occur when researchers' expectations influence study outcome. These biases are strongest researchers expect a particular result, measuring subjective variables, have an incentive to produce data that confirm predictions. To minimize bias, it is good practice work "blind," meaning experimenters unaware of the identity or treatment group their subjects while conducting research. Here, using text mining literature review, we find evidence blind protocols uncommon in life sciences nonblind studies tend report higher effect sizes more significant p-values. We discuss methods urge researchers, editors, peer reviewers keep mind.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (37)
CITATIONS (194)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....