Machine Learning Meta-analysis of Large Metagenomic Datasets: Tools and Biological Insights
Evolution
QH301-705.5
Machine Learning
Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
03 medical and health sciences
Behavior and Systematics
Genetics
Colorectal Neoplasms; Computational Biology; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Metagenome; Metagenomics; Obesity; Software; Machine Learning; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; Modeling and Simulation; Ecology; Molecular Biology; Genetics; Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience; Computational Theory and Mathematics
Humans
Obesity
Biology (General)
Molecular Biology
0303 health sciences
Ecology
Computational Biology
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
3. Good health
Computational Theory and Mathematics
Modeling and Simulation
Metagenome
Metagenomics
Colorectal Neoplasms
Software
Research Article
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004977
Publication Date:
2016-07-11T17:28:34Z
AUTHORS (5)
ABSTRACT
Shotgun metagenomic analysis of the human associated microbiome provides a rich set of microbial features for prediction and biomarker discovery in the context of human diseases and health conditions. However, the use of such high-resolution microbial features presents new challenges, and validated computational tools for learning tasks are lacking. Moreover, classification rules have scarcely been validated in independent studies, posing questions about the generality and generalization of disease-predictive models across cohorts. In this paper, we comprehensively assess approaches to metagenomics-based prediction tasks and for quantitative assessment of the strength of potential microbiome-phenotype associations. We develop a computational framework for prediction tasks using quantitative microbiome profiles, including species-level relative abundances and presence of strain-specific markers. A comprehensive meta-analysis, with particular emphasis on generalization across cohorts, was performed in a collection of 2424 publicly available metagenomic samples from eight large-scale studies. Cross-validation revealed good disease-prediction capabilities, which were in general improved by feature selection and use of strain-specific markers instead of species-level taxonomic abundance. In cross-study analysis, models transferred between studies were in some cases less accurate than models tested by within-study cross-validation. Interestingly, the addition of healthy (control) samples from other studies to training sets improved disease prediction capabilities. Some microbial species (most notably Streptococcus anginosus) seem to characterize general dysbiotic states of the microbiome rather than connections with a specific disease. Our results in modelling features of the "healthy" microbiome can be considered a first step toward defining general microbial dysbiosis. The software framework, microbiome profiles, and metadata for thousands of samples are publicly available at http://segatalab.cibio.unitn.it/tools/metaml.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (66)
CITATIONS (494)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....