Optimizing household survey methods to monitor the Sustainable Development Goals targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: A mixed-methods field-test in Belize

• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189089
• Publication Date: 2017-12-07T13:33:14Z
• Authors: Shane M. Khan; Robert E. S. Bain; Karsten Lunze; Turgay Unalan; Bo Beshanski-Pede...; Tom Slaymaker; Richard Johnston; Attila Hancioglu
• Keywords: Conservation of Natural Resources; Science; 12. Responsible consumption; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Surveys and Questionnaires; 11. Sustainability; Escherichia coli; Humans; 14. Life underwater; Sanitation; 2. Zero hunger; Drinking Water; Q; R; 1. No poverty; 15. Life on land; Belize; 6. Clean water; Menstruation; Medicine; Female; Water Microbiology; Research Article

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) require household survey programmes such as the UNICEF-supported Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) to enhance data collection to cover new indicators. This study aims to evaluated methods for assessing water quality, water availability, emptying of sanitation facilities, menstrual hygiene management and the acceptability of water quality testing in households which are key to monitoring SDG targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) and emerging issues.As part of a MICS field test, we interviewed 429 households and 267 women age 15-49 in Stann Creek, Belize in a split-sample experiment. In a concurrent qualitative component, we conducted focus groups with interviewers and cognitive interviews with respondents during and immediately following questionnaire administration in the field to explore their question comprehension and response processes.About 88% of respondents agreed to water quality testing but also desired test results, given the potential implications for their own health. Escherichia coli was present in 36% of drinking water collected at the source, and in 47% of samples consumed in the household. Both questions on water availability necessitated probing by interviewers. About one quarter of households reported emptying of pit latrines and septic tanks, though one-quarter could not provide an answer to the question. Asking questions on menstrual hygiene was acceptable to respondents, but required some clarification and probing.In the context of Belize, this study confirmed the feasibility of collecting information on the availability and quality of drinking water, emptying of sanitation facilities and menstrual hygiene in a multi-purpose household survey, indicating specific areas to improve question formulation and field protocols. Improvements have been incorporated into the latest round of MICS surveys which will be a major source of national data for monitoring of SDG targets for drinking water, sanitation and hygiene and emerging issues for WASH sector programming.