The role of interleukin-6 as a prognostic biomarker for predicting acute exacerbation in interstitial lung diseases

• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255365
• Publication Date: 2021-07-27T17:25:23Z
• Authors: Jae Ha Lee; Ji Hoon Jang; Jin Han Park; Hang-Jea Jang; Chan Sun Park; Sunggun Lee; Seong-Ho Kim; Ji Yeon Kim; Hyun Kuk Kim
• Keywords: Male; Science; 03 medical and health sciences; Oxygen Consumption; 0302 clinical medicine; Risk Factors; Republic of Korea; Humans; Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias; Connective Tissue Diseases; Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Interleukin-6; Q; R; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Survival Analysis; Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis; 3. Good health; Logistic Models; Disease Progression; Medicine; Female; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Biomarkers; Research Article

Background Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are chronic, parenchymal lung diseases with a variable clinical course and a poor prognosis. Within various clinical courses, acute exacerbation (AE) is a devastating condition with significant morbidity and high mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of interleukin-6 (IL-6) to predict AE and prognosis in patients with ILD.

Methods Eighty-three patients who were diagnosed with ILD from 2016 to 2019 at the Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, South Korea, were included and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.

Results The median follow-up period was 20 months. The mean age was 68.1 years and 65.1% of the patients were men with 60.2% of patients being ever-smokers. Among ILDs, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis was the most common disease (68.7%), followed by connective tissue disease-associated ILD (14.5%), cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (9.6%), and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (6.0%). The serum levels of IL-6 were measured at diagnosis with ILD and sequentially at follow-up visits. During the follow-ups, 15 (18.1%) patients experienced an acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD and among them, four (26.7%) patients died. In the multivariable analysis, high levels of IL-6 (OR 1.014, 95% CI: 1.001–1.027, p = 0.036) along with lower baseline saturations of peripheral oxygen (SpO2) were independent risk factors for AE. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.815 (p < 0.001) and the optimal cut-off value of serum IL-6 to predict AE was 25.20 pg/mL with a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 80.6%. In the multivariable Cox analysis, a high level of serum IL-6 (HR 1.007, 95% CI: 1.001–1.014, p = 0.018) was only an independent risk factor for mortality in ILD patients.

Conclusions In our study, a high level of serum IL-6 is a useful biomarker to predict AE and poor prognosis in patients with ILD.