Accusative case in passives
Nominative case
Mandarin Chinese
Dative case
DOI:
10.1515/ling.1999.37.1.1
Publication Date:
2021-02-28T09:10:52Z
AUTHORS (1)
ABSTRACT
Abstract The standard explanation for Ν Ρ movement in the passive construction has been that N P must move into nominative position because no accusative case is available. This paper examines implications this view of some double-object constructions Mandarin Chinese and English are ungrammatical as active clauses but improve significantly passives. These facts unexpected under passives, I suggest they can be explained if we assume second object not licensed versions able to check version, thus arguing available clauses.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (0)
CITATIONS (34)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....