Synapsin Determines Memory Strength after Punishment- and Relief-Learning

• DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4454-14.2015
• Publication Date: 2015-05-13T17:31:53Z
• Authors: Thomas Niewalda; Birgit Michels; Roswitha Jungnickel; Sören Diegelmann; Jörg Kleber; Thilo Kähne; Bertram Gerber
• Keywords: Male; 0301 basic medicine; Electroshock; Age Factors; Association Learning; Brain; Synapsins; Animals, Genetically Modified; 03 medical and health sciences; Discrimination, Psychological; Drosophila melanogaster; Punishment; Memory; Mutation; Odorants; Avoidance Learning; Animals; Drosophila Proteins; Female; RNA Interference; Phosphorylation; memory ; relief ; Drosophila ; punishment ; Synapsin ; pain

Adverse life events can induce two kinds of memory with opposite valence, dependent on timing: “negative” memories for stimuli preceding them and “positive” memories for stimuli experienced at the moment of “relief.” Such punishment memory and relief memory are found in insects, rats, and man. For example, fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) avoid an odor after odor-shock training (“forward conditioning” of the odor), whereas after shock-odor training (“backward conditioning” of the odor) they approach it. Do these timing-dependent associative processes share molecular determinants? We focus on the role of Synapsin, a conserved presynaptic phosphoprotein regulating the balance between the reserve pool and the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles. We find that a lack of Synapsin leaves task-relevant sensory and motor faculties unaffected. In contrast, both punishment memory and relief memory scores are reduced. These defects reflect a true lessening of associative memory strength, as distortions in nonassociative processing (e.g., susceptibility to handling, adaptation, habituation, sensitization), discrimination ability, and changes in the time course of coincidence detection can be ruled out as alternative explanations. Reductions in punishment- and relief-memory strength are also observed upon an RNAi-mediated knock-down of Synapsin, and are rescued both by acutely restoring Synapsin and by locally restoring it in the mushroom bodies of mutant flies. Thus, both punishment memory and relief memory require the Synapsin protein and in this sense share genetic and molecular determinants. We note that corresponding molecular commonalities between punishment memory and relief memory in humans would constrain pharmacological attempts to selectively interfere with excessive associative punishment memories, e.g., after traumatic experiences.