Functional Signal- and Paradigm-Dependent Linear Relationships between Synaptic Activity and Hemodynamic Responses in Rat Somatosensory Cortex

• DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4870-03.2004
• Publication Date: 2004-04-14T17:33:13Z
• Authors: Masahito Nemoto; Sameer Sheth; Michael Guiou; Nader Pouratian; James W. Y. Chen; Arthur W. Toga
• Keywords: Male; Optics and Photonics; neurovascular coupling; Statistics as Topic; 610; 612; Synaptic Transmission; somatosensory; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; optical imaging; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Animals; Evoked Potentials; Brain Mapping; Blood Volume; fMRI; linear systems; Somatosensory Cortex; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Electric Stimulation; Hindlimb; Rats; Oxygen; blood volume; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Microelectrodes

Linear relationships between synaptic activity and hemodynamic responses are critically dependent on functional signal etiology and paradigm. To investigate these relationships, we simultaneously measured local field potentials (FPs) and optical intrinsic signals in rat somatosensory cortex while delivering a small number of electrical pulses to the hindpaw with varied stimulus intensity, number, and interstimulus interval. We used 570 and 610 nm optical signals to estimate cerebral blood volume (CBV) and oxygenation, respectively.The spatiotemporal evolution patterns and trial-by-trial correlation analyses revealed that CBV-related optical signals have higher fidelity to summed evoked FPs (ΣFPs) than oxygenation-derived signals. CBV-related signals even correlated with minute ΣFP fluctuations within trials of the same stimulus condition. Furthermore, hemodynamic signals (CBV and late oxygenation signals) increased linearly with ΣFP while varying stimulus number, but they exhibited a threshold and steeper gradient while varying stimulus intensity, suggesting insufficiency of the homogeneity property of linear systems and the importance of spatiotemporal coherence of neuronal population activity in hemodynamic response formation. These stimulus paradigm-dependent linear and nonlinear relationships demonstrate that simple subtraction-based analyses of hemodynamic signals produced by complex stimulus paradigms may not reflect a difference in ΣFPs between paradigms. Functional signal- and paradigm-dependent linearity have potentially profound implications for the interpretation of perfusion-based functional signals.