A Fresh Frozen Cadaver Procedure Laboratory

• DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.794
• Publication Date: 2014-09-26T15:21:46Z
• Authors: Frank Messina; Lee Wilbur; Edward Bartkus; Dylan Cooper; Gretchen Huffman
• Keywords: Mandate; Grading (engineering)

OPEN ACCESSAugust 29, 2008A Fresh Frozen Cadaver Procedure Laboratory Frank Messina, MD, Lee Wilbur, Edward Bartkus, Dylan Cooper, Gretchen Huffman, BA MD Indiana University School of Medicine Google Scholar More articles by this author , https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.794 SectionsAbout ToolsDownload Citations ShareFacebookTwitterEmail Abstract Introduction: Certifying boards, such as the American Board Emergency Medicine, mandate that its candidates be taught, and demonstrate competence in, performance certain diagnostic therapeutic procedures. There is no on how to accomplish much controversy over best method. In response, we created a lab using fresh frozen cadavers teach procedural skills. Methods: During 4-day (2 days in June, 2 July) lab, first-, second-, third-year emergency medicine residents practice supervised procedures suitable their level training. Trainees are invited session with level-specific objectives provided checklist procedure steps expected completion time, upon which they evaluated. This publication includes description set-up list supplies needed facilitate session. Each role-play resident obtaining informed consent has indications contraindications. The bulk time spent one-on-one supervision performing atlases texts at each cadaver for real-time reference. Results: Formally solicited feedback from 100% participants, both faculty, been unanimously positive helped us create final refined process. Discussion: Scheduling instruction evaluation during controlled workshops set curriculum objective criteria realistic, unembalmed allows predictability, consistency, reproducibility, thoroughness, providing framework document competence. maximizes use resources, including themselves, supplies, space, learner faculty can adapted any number learners discipline. Educational Objectives By end session, will able to: Describe for, contraindications to, residency year-specific procedures.Describe risks benefits those while patient role play.Describe materials necessary perform procedures.Perform proper technique within stated limits human cadaver.Verbalize all landmarks rationale actions. Sign up latest publications MedEdPORTAL Add your email below FILES INCLUDEDReferencesRelatedDetails INCLUDED Included publication: Instructor's Guide.doc User R1 Workshop Objective.doc R2 R3 Supplies Needed.xls Arthrocentesis Checklist Knee.doc Central Line-IJ Checklist.doc Line-Fem Line-SC Cricothyrotomy Intubation Oral.doc IO LP Pericardiocentesis Tube Thoracostomy Lab Feedback Form.doc Competency Evaluation Form.xls List.doc Faculty Invitation Letter.doc Bibliography.doc To view components, extract (i.e., unzip) them downloaded .zip file. Download editor’s noteThis may contain technology or display format longer use. CitationMessina F, Wilbur L, Bartkus E, Cooper D, Huffman G. A Laboratory. MedEdPORTAL. 2008;4:794. Copyright & Permissions© 2008 Messina et al. an open-access distributed under terms Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license.KeywordsTube ThoracostomyCadaverCentral Venous CannulationFemoral Nerve BlockLaceration RepairInternship ResidencyArthrocentesisCricothyrotomyNeedle ThoracostomyPericardiocentesis Disclosures None report. Funding/Support Loading ...