Evaluating Health‐Related Quality of Life: Cost Comparison of Computerized Touch‐Screen Technology and Traditional Paper Systems
Facsimile
Questionnaire
Survey data collection
DOI:
10.1592/phco.20.17.1390.34887
Publication Date:
2004-06-15T19:27:47Z
AUTHORS (3)
ABSTRACT
We estimated and compared the costs for three different methods of administering evaluating Short Form‐36 as a routine part clinical practice from provider perspective. In an outpatient pain management practice, we assessed computer touch‐screen system with facsimile scanning scoring methods. Equipment, supply, labor needed to construct, maintain, generate reports each were measured. The annual fixed, variable, total costs/survey calculated. Sensitivity analyses performed varying number surveys administered/year. method was least costly, $9.62 $5.88/survey, at questionnaire volumes 250 1000, respectively. When survey volume increased 1250 (5 surveys/day), ($5.63/survey) ($5.65/survey) nearly equivalent per administration. At 1500 above, costly touch screen $5.47/survey. implemented in is dependent not only on but also personnel availability, equipment access, required speed results, acceptable level data error.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (13)
CITATIONS (26)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....