LEGALLY SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS AS A TOOL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: THEORETICAL AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTICS AND EXAMPLES

• DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.08
• Publication Date: 2023-01-10T21:56:59Z
• Authors: Anastasiia Antonenko
• Keywords: Section (typography)

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to determine essence legally significant actions as atool public administration through theoretical and legal characterization their featuresand analysis examples by which certain can or, on contrary, can’t be attributedto them.Methods. research methodology consists general special methods scientificknowledge, among main ones are comparative (for comparing scientific views andlegal provisions), synthesis, deduction induction (when studying signs thetools attributing specific types individual committedby subjects administration), systemic-structural (the use conditioned theneed for a systematic consistent study thepossibility tools them), formal-logical (duringresearch content features administrative acts enshrined in law consistency ofscientific points view with them) etc.Results. first section examines actions,established proposed sources. impracticality themactions that do not lead consequences substantiated. An example significantactions committed form inactivity given.In second article, tools-actions publicadministration analyzed visual demonstration possibility classifying certainactions significant. In this context, implementation initiative purchase private property objectsfor needs, voting carried out at meetings subjects, includingthe decision objects considered.Conclusions. conclusions, concept formof Law Ukraine “On procedure”, theexpression or inactions administration, providedat regulatory level, characterized all category ofpublic without exception. It emphasized one cases, order achieve result performance powers entrusted thepublic they must applied combination decisions. most expressive listed. Proposals forimproving regulation have been formulated.