Missed Opportune Children for Immunisation versus Immunisation Defaulters: Why Are They Indistinguishable?
Default
Global Health
Guideline
DOI:
10.20944/preprints202108.0435.v1
Publication Date:
2021-08-24T07:15:19Z
AUTHORS (2)
ABSTRACT
The two major global immunisation agenda framings (Missed Opportunity for Immunisation, MOI vs Immunisation Defaulting) are interchangeably and inappropriately used in public health research practice with flawed or misleading strategies recommended adopted various settings globally. This is evident the fact that many opportunities to adopt evidence/findings from coverage policy grossly missed. Ineffectiveness of inappropriate interventions biased evidence can discourage mislead governance make radical decisions by discretion. could be reason inability low-and middle-income countries vaccinate 80% their children otherwise; this also poses a threat capable nations. current guideline information on defaulting appear insufficient little clarification it would assist forerunners achieve measurable progress ensuring good especially countries. Consequently, paper aimed at addressing issue appropriate recommendations. Optimistically, will stimulate further discussions, streamline differences, gear subject matter, target 2030
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (0)
CITATIONS (1)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....