Critical inspiratory pressure - new methodology for evaluating and training the inspiratory musculature for recreational cyclists: study protocol for a randomized control trial
Adult
Male
Medicine (General)
Time Factors
Breathing Exercises
Physical performance
Study Protocol
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
R5-920
Oxygen Consumption
0302 clinical medicine
Double-Blind Method
Pressure
Humans
Critical power
Muscle Strength
Physiotherapy
Respiratory muscle
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Physical exercise
Respiratory Muscles
Bicycling
Respiratory Function Tests
3. Good health
Treatment Outcome
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Inhalation
Exercise Test
Physical Endurance
Muscle Contraction
DOI:
10.21203/rs.2.178/v2
Publication Date:
2019-03-03T15:22:26Z
AUTHORS (7)
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background: Inspiratory muscle training(IMT) has brought great benefits to improving physical performance in healthy individuals. However, there is no consensus regarding the best training load as most cases maximum inspiratory pressure(MIP) been used, whereby 60% of MIP used. Therefore, prescription an IMT protocol that takes into account respiratory strength and endurance may bring additional commonly used protocols muscles differ from other because their greater muscular resistance. Thus, using critical pressure(PThC) appears alternative since calculation PThC considers these characteristics. aim this study propose a new determine for recreational cyclists. Methods: Thirty cyclists(between 20-40 years) will be randomized SHAM Group(SG), Group(PCG) Group(60G), taking age aerobic functional capacity. All participants undergo following evaluations: pulmonary function test(PFT), test(RMS), cardiopulmonary test(CPET), incremental test(iRME) [maximum sustained pressure 1 minute(PThMAX)] constant test(CLT) (95%, 100% 105% PThMÁX) linear resistor(PowerBreathe K5). The calculated time(TLIM) loads each CLT. last 11 weeks(3 times/week hour/session). session consist 5-minute warm-ups(50% load) 3 sets 15-minute breaths (100% load), with minute interval between them. RMS, iRME, CLT CPET performed before, at week 7(to adjust after training. PFT before data analyzed by specific statistical tests (parametric or non-parametric) according distribution respective variances. p <0.05 established. Conclusions: It expected results enable health professionals tool evaluate prescribe IMT. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrial.gov, ID Number NCT02984189. Registered December 6, 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02984189.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (0)
CITATIONS (0)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....