Development and Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: User-Centered Design Approach (Preprint)

• DOI: 10.2196/preprints.24038
• Publication Date: 2020-09-09T15:52:59Z
• Authors: Angela Keniston; Lauren McBeth; Jonathan Pell Sr; Kasey Bowden; Stephen Ball; Kristin Stoebner; Elaina Scherzberg; Susan L Moore; Jamie Nordhagen; Amanda Anthony; Marisha Burden
• Keywords: 03 medical and health sciences; 0305 other medical science; 3. Good health

BACKGROUND Typical solutions for improving discharge planning often rely on one-way communication mechanisms, static data entry into the electronic health record (EHR), or in-person meetings. Lack of timely and effective communication can adversely affect patients and their care teams.

OBJECTIVE Applying robust user-centered design strategies, we aimed to design an innovative EHR-based discharge readiness communication tool (the Discharge Today tool) to enable care teams to communicate any barriers to discharge, the status of patient discharge readiness, and patient discharge needs in real time across hospital settings.

METHODS We employed multiple user-centered design strategies, including exploration of the current state for documenting discharge readiness and directing discharge planning, iterative low-fidelity prototypes, multidisciplinary stakeholder meetings, a brainwriting premortem exercise, and preproduction user testing. We iteratively collected feedback from users via meetings and surveys.

RESULTS We conducted 28 meetings with 20 different stakeholder groups. From these stakeholder meetings, we developed 14 low-fidelity prototypes prior to deploying the Discharge Today tool for our pilot study. During the pilot study, stakeholders requested 46 modifications, of which 25 (54%) were successfully executed. We found that most providers who responded to the survey reported that the tool either saved time or did not change the amount of time required to complete their discharge workflow (21/24, 88%). Responses to open-ended questions offered both positive feedback and opportunities for improvement in the domains of efficiency, integration into workflow, avoidance of redundancies, expedited communication, and patient-centeredness.

CONCLUSIONS Survey data suggest that this electronic discharge readiness tool has been successfully adopted by providers and clinical staff. Frequent stakeholder engagement and iterative user-centered design were critical to the successful implementation of this tool.