Viral Load Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Saliva in Korean Patients: a Prospective Multi-center Comparative Study

Adult Aged, 80 and over Male 0301 basic medicine Adolescent SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia, Viral COVID-19 Middle Aged Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction 3. Good health Betacoronavirus 03 medical and health sciences Nasopharynx Republic of Korea Humans RNA, Viral Original Article Female Prospective Studies Coronavirus Infections Saliva Pandemics Aged
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e287 Publication Date: 2020-08-06T06:54:25Z
ABSTRACT
This study was performed to compare the viral load and kinetics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in saliva with those in standard nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal (NP/OP) swabs.Fifteen patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection from four hospitals were prospectively enrolled and matched samples of nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs and saliva were collected at Day 1 of admission and every other day till consequently negative for two times. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was performed to detect the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) genes.The cycle threshold values of saliva were comparable to those of NP/OP swabs overall (P = 0.720, Mann-Whitney U test). However, the overall sensitivity of rRT-PCR using saliva was 64% (34/53), which is lower than the 77% (41/53) using NP/OP swabs. The sensitivity of rRT-PCR using saliva was especially lower in early stage of symptom onset (1-5 days; 8/15; 53%) and in patients who did not have sputum (12/22; 55%).Saliva sample itself is not appropriate for initial diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to replace NP/OP swabs, especially for the person who does not produce sputum. COVID-19 cannot be excluded when the test using saliva is negative, and it is necessary to retest using NP/OP swabs.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (20)
CITATIONS (31)