Sparse testing designs for optimizing predictive ability in sugarcane populations
sparse testing designs
Optimization
0301 basic medicine
Biología
Plant culture
Plant Science
genomic selection GS
SB1-1110
genomic prediction GP
03 medical and health sciences
Genomic selection GS
Genomic prediction GP
Sugarcane breeding
Sparse testing designs
sugarcane breeding
optimization
DOI:
10.3389/fpls.2024.1400000
Publication Date:
2024-07-23T05:12:55Z
AUTHORS (8)
ABSTRACT
Sugarcane is a crucial crop for sugar and bioenergy production. Saccharose content total weight are the two main key commercial traits that compose sugarcane’s yield. These under complex genetic control their response patterns influenced by genotype-by-environment (G×E) interaction. An efficient breeding of sugarcane demands an accurate assessment genotype stability through multi-environment trials (METs), where genotypes tested/evaluated across different environments. However, phenotyping all genotype-in-environment combinations often impractical due to cost limited availability propagation-materials. This study introduces sparse testing designs as viable alternative, leveraging genomic information predict unobserved prediction models. approach was applied dataset comprising 186 six environments (6×186=1,116 phenotypes). Our employed three predictive models, including environment, genotype, markers effects, well G×E saccharose accumulation (SA) tons cane per hectare (TCH). Calibration sets sizes varying between 72 (6.5%) (16.7%) number phenotypes were composed remaining 930 (83.3%). Additionally, we explored optimal common pattern prediction. Results demonstrate maximum accuracy SA ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="im1"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.611</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> ) TCH id="im2"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ρ=0.341</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> achieved using in training few (3) no (0) maximizing tested only once. Significantly, show reducing phenotypic records model calibration has minimal impact on ability, with 12 non-overlapped environment (72=12×6) being most convenient cost-benefit combination.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (54)
CITATIONS (1)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....