Postoperative Pain and Incisional Hernia of Specimen Extraction Sites for Minimally Invasive Rectal Cancer Surgery: Comparison of Periumbilical Midline Incision Versus Pfannenstiel Incision

• DOI: 10.3390/jcm14082697
• Publication Date: 2025-04-15T10:50:27Z
• Authors: Yasuhiro Takeda; Keisuke Goto; Teppei Kamada; Tadashi Abe; Takafumi Nakano; Yasuhiro Takano; Masahisa Ohkuma; Makoto Kosuge; Ken Eto

Background: Recent studies indicate that minimally invasive surgery is widely accepted as the optimal procedure for colorectal cancer. However, the ideal location of the specimen extraction site remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the conventional periumbilical midline incision with the Pfannenstiel incision for specimen extraction during minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 76 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery (double-stapling technique anastomosis) for rectal cancer between January 2022 and June 2023. The postoperative short- and mid-term outcomes were compared between the periumbilical midline incision and Pfannenstiel incision groups. Results: The patients’ backgrounds were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the surgical outcomes or short-term postoperative complications. The Pfannenstiel incision demonstrated advantages, including reduced postoperative pain at rest and during movement, and a lower incidence of incisional hernia (p = 0.038). Conclusions: The Pfannenstiel incision is a safe and effective option associated with reduced postoperative pain and a lower risk of incisional hernia. Therefore, it can serve as a useful alternative for specimen extraction during minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery.