Comparison of two kinds of noninvasive ventilation mode in premature infants with respiratory failure
Positive airway pressure
Intermittent mandatory ventilation
Peak inspiratory pressure
DOI:
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2016.04.005
Publication Date:
2016-04-20
AUTHORS (5)
ABSTRACT
Objective
To investigate the difference of two models respiratory failure in preterm infants with nasal continuous positive airway pressure(nCPAP) and biphasic pressure(nBiPAP).
Methods
Comparative analysis 81 cases premature requiring support was needed.They were applied nCPAP nBiPAP ventilation mode treatment.The use breathing machine total oxygen inhalation time, number treatment failures, PEEP parameters ventilator, recent complications secondary infections compared.
Results
In group, average time noninvasive was(96.34 ± 31.5)h, was(10.11 9.39)d, 3 failure, incidence severe 5.56%(2/36), PEEP(4.08±0.73)cmH2O(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa). In was(114.14±41.69)h, was(17.53±15.96)d, 15 failed, 15.56%(7/45), PEEP(5.11±1.01)cmH2O.There significant differences between groups(P 0.05).
Conclusion
nBiPAP as one first choice for significantly better than nCPAP, soon proper can avoid invasive ventilation.
Key words:
Positive pressure; Mechanical ventilation; Preterm infants; Newborn; Respiratory
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES ()
CITATIONS ()
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....