Hamming Attention Distillation: Binarizing Keys and Queries for Efficient Long-Context Transformers
FOS: Computer and information sciences
Computer Science - Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence
Image and Video Processing (eess.IV)
FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Image and Video Processing
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
DOI:
10.48550/arxiv.2502.01770
Publication Date:
2025-01-01
AUTHORS (11)
ABSTRACT
Pre-trained transformer models with extended context windows are notoriously expensive to run at scale, often limiting real-world deployment due to their high computational and memory requirements. In this paper, we introduce Hamming Attention Distillation (HAD), a novel framework that binarizes keys and queries in the attention mechanism to achieve significant efficiency gains. By converting keys and queries into {-1, +1} vectors and replacing dot-product operations with efficient Hamming distance computations, our method drastically reduces computational overhead. Additionally, we incorporate attention matrix sparsification to prune low-impact activations, which further reduces the cost of processing long-context sequences. \par Despite these aggressive compression strategies, our distilled approach preserves a high degree of representational power, leading to substantially improved accuracy compared to prior transformer binarization methods. We evaluate HAD on a range of tasks and models, including the GLUE benchmark, ImageNet, and QuALITY, demonstrating state-of-the-art performance among binarized Transformers while drastically reducing the computational costs of long-context inference. \par We implement HAD in custom hardware simulations, demonstrating superior performance characteristics compared to a custom hardware implementation of standard attention. HAD achieves just $\mathbf{1.78}\%$ performance losses on GLUE compared to $9.08\%$ in state-of-the-art binarization work, and $\mathbf{2.5}\%$ performance losses on ImageNet compared to $12.14\%$, all while targeting custom hardware with a $\mathbf{79}\%$ area reduction and $\mathbf{87}\%$ power reduction compared to its standard attention counterpart.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES ()
CITATIONS ()
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....