Actual Achieved Gain and Optimal Perceived Gain: Modeling Human Take-over Decisions Towards Automated Vehicles' Suggestions
FOS: Computer and information sciences
Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
DOI:
10.48550/arxiv.2502.06179
Publication Date:
2025-02-10
AUTHORS (10)
ABSTRACT
Driver decision quality in take-overs is critical for effective human-Autonomous Driving System (ADS) collaboration. However, current research lacks detailed analysis of its variations. This paper introduces two metrics--Actual Achieved Gain (AAG) and Optimal Perceived (OPG)--to assess quality, with OPG representing optimal decisions AAG reflecting actual outcomes. Both are calculated as weighted averages perceived gains losses, influenced by ADS accuracy. Study 1 (N=315) used a 21-point Thurstone scale to measure losses-key components OPG-across typical tasks: route selection, overtaking, collision avoidance. Studies 2 (N=54) 3 modeled under varying accuracy time. Results show sufficient time (>3.5s), converges towards OPG, indicating rational decision-making, while limited leads intuitive deterministic choices. also linked AAG-OPG deviations irrational behaviors. An intervention study (N=8) pilot (N=4) employing voice alarms multi-modal based on these demonstrated AAG's potential improve quality.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES ()
CITATIONS ()
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....