A5083607719- Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Team Dynamics and Performance
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Socioeconomic Development in MENA
- Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Business Law and Ethics
- Conflict Management and Negotiation
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Conferences and Exhibitions Management
- Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
- Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Expert finding and Q&A systems
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
University of California, Berkeley
2008-2024
Dartmouth College
2024
Across four studies (
Lies often go undetected, and we know little about the psychological relational consequences of successfully deceiving others. While evidence to date indicates that undetected dishonesty induces positive affect in independent decision contexts, propose it may elicit guilt undermine satisfaction negotiations despite facilitating better deals for deceivers. Across four studies, find support a deceiver's account, whereby triggers lessens negotiators' with bargaining experience. This pattern is...
Across four studies (N = 816 U.S. adults), we uncover a gender stereotype about dual pathways to social hierarchy: men are associated with power and women status. We detect this pattern both explicitly implicitly in perceptions of individuals drawn from Forbes’ powerful people lists undergraduate online samples. examine cognitive implications, including prominent people’s degree recognition by society, the formation men’s women’s self-concepts. find that (status) ratings predict greater...
Across four studies ( N = 816 U.S. adults), we uncovered a gender stereotype about dual pathways to social hierarchy: Men were associated with power, and women status. We detected this pattern both explicitly implicitly in perceptions of individuals drawn from Forbes magazine’s powerful people lists undergraduate online samples. examined social-cognitive implications, including prominent people’s degree recognition by society, the formation men’s women’s self-concepts. found that power...
Gender disparities in participation at conferences is a well-studied phenomenon, and seem to be propelled by men being more likely initiate questions. An unexplored explanation for why this gap may occur that women than fear backlash their participation. Across four studies, we tested fears of as mechanism explain gender gaps Q&A session Fears explained the variance between question-asking intentions hypothetical scenario. Women’s reduced were attenuated friendly compared typical...
Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser Add to My Library Share: Permalink Using these links will ensure access this page indefinitely Copy URL DOI
Question-and-answer (Q&A) sessions following research talks provide key opportunities for the audience to engage in scientific discourse. Gender inequities persist academia which women are underrepresented as faculty and their contributions less valued (Ceci & Williams, 2011). In this paper, we test how gender difference translates face-to-face Q&A session participation its psychological correlates. Across two studies examining three conferences, men...
Consistent with power and status differences between men women in society, tend to participate more than do question-and-answer (Q&A) sessions at in-person academic conferences. This gap participation scientific discourse may perpetuate the quo. The current research examines whether this gender Q&A extends virtual conferences, which have become prevalent during COVID-19 pandemic. Due shifts conference formats enable asynchronous, anonymous, and/or simultaneous participation,...
Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser Add to My Library Share: Permalink Using these links will ensure access this page indefinitely Copy URL DOI