Rye J. Anderson

ORCID: 0009-0006-0513-5723
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Services Management and Policy
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Healthcare Systems and Challenges
  • FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • School Health and Nursing Education
  • Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health and Well-being Studies

PricewaterhouseCoopers (United States)
2023

Brain Tumour Charity
2011

The Royal Free Hospital
1968

University College London
1968

10.1136/bmj.1.4024.419-c article EN BMJ 1938-02-19

The potential efficacy of screening for trisomy 21 in the first trimester, using maternal serum markers α fetoprotein, free β human chorionic gonadotropin, unconjugated oestriol and pregnancy associated plasma protein A, was studied an unselected population women between seventh fourteenth week gestation. Using a combination fetoprotein 53% affected pregnancies could be identified at false positive rate 5%. Unconjugated A levels were lower cases 21, but their inclusion with other did not...

10.1177/000456329403100504 article EN Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine 1994-09-01

Poor cancer survival rates in the United Kingdom are often blamed on delayed medical care. A local audit of endometrial revealed a variety preventable delays. We surveyed practice South West England to see if this was an isolated or widespread problem.All 15 hospitals collected information prospectively from all women with over 3 months spring 2009.There were delays stages uterine pathway. Excluding extraneous cases, 52% waited more than month and 12% 6 their GP onset symptoms. Almost half...

10.1038/bjc.2011.173 article EN cc-by-nc-sa British Journal of Cancer 2011-05-24

Abstract The first biomarker-based cervical cancer screening test, p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology (DS), has been clinically validated and approved in the United States for triage of women being screened who test positive high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV). primary aim this work is to evaluate cost-effectiveness DS after co-testing findings non-16/18 HPV types atypical squamous cells undetermined significance or low-grade intraepithelial lesions cytology. A payer-perspective Markov...

10.1158/1940-6207.capr-22-0455 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Cancer Prevention Research 2023-05-20

<p>Supplemental Table S1 shows the unpublished data from IMPACT clinical trial referenced in for model inputs</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026963 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<p>Supplemental Table S3 shows the procedure codes, CMS fee schedule payments, and usage information used to develop cost inputs for screening visits, tests, procedures</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026957 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<p>Supplemental Table S1 shows the unpublished data from IMPACT clinical trial referenced in for model inputs</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026963.v1 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<p>Supplemental Table S2 shows the distribution of patient attributes in prevalent US population women eligible for cervical cancer screening</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026960 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<p>Supplemental Table S3 shows the procedure codes, CMS fee schedule payments, and usage information used to develop cost inputs for screening visits, tests, procedures</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026957.v1 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<p>Supplemental Table S2 shows the distribution of patient attributes in prevalent US population women eligible for cervical cancer screening</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026960.v1 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<p>Supplemental Table S4 shows the top five most influential inputs based on one-way sensitivity analyses each of mean change in costs, QALYs, and life-years with addition DS reflex to common co-testing screening strategies</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026954.v1 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<p>Supplemental Table S4 shows the top five most influential inputs based on one-way sensitivity analyses each of mean change in costs, QALYs, and life-years with addition DS reflex to common co-testing screening strategies</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026954 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<p>Supplemental Figure S1 shows tornado diagrams of range results observed in the one-way sensitivity analyses</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026969.v1 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<p>Supplemental Figure S1 shows tornado diagrams of range results observed in the one-way sensitivity analyses</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026969 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<div>Abstract<p>The first biomarker-based cervical cancer screening test, p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology (DS), has been clinically validated and approved in the United States for triage of women being screened who test positive high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV). The primary aim this work is to evaluate cost-effectiveness DS after co-testing findings non-16/18 HPV types atypical squamous cells undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade intraepithelial lesions (LSIL)...

10.1158/1940-6207.c.6709342.v3 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<p>Supplemental Figure S2 shows the proportion of PSA simulations that were cost-effective at varying willingness-to-pay thresholds</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026966.v1 preprint EN 2024-09-16

<p>Supplemental Figure S2 shows the proportion of PSA simulations that were cost-effective at varying willingness-to-pay thresholds</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.27026966 preprint EN 2024-09-16

10.1136/bmj.1.4027.595 article EN BMJ 1938-03-12

<p>Supplemental Table S1 shows the unpublished data from IMPACT clinical trial referenced in for model inputs</p>

10.1158/1940-6207.23563672.v1 preprint EN cc-by 2023-06-22
Coming Soon ...