Multi‐Drug‐Resistance‐Reverting Agents: 2‐Aryloxazole and 2‐Arylthiazole Derivatives as Potent BCRP or MRP1 Inhibitors

0301 basic medicine Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all) Drug Resistance P-glycoprotein Kidney Oxazole Mass Spectrometry Cell Line Neoplasm Protein 03 medical and health sciences 2-aryloxazole Dogs Cell Line, Tumor Dog ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2 Animals Humans Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein Oxazoles Ultraviolet Pharmacology 0303 health sciences Tumor Animal Organic Chemistry Fluoresceins Drug Resistance, Multiple Neoplasm Proteins 3. Good health Multi-drug resistance Thiazoles Spectrophotometry Drug Resistance, Neoplasm 2-arylthiazole Neoplasm Molecular Medicine BCRP Fluorescein ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet Thiazole Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins Multiple Human
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.200800329 Publication Date: 2009-01-12T15:32:56Z
ABSTRACT
AbstractThe 2‐aryloxazole and 2‐arylthiazole scaffolds were used for generating compounds that we characterized for their inhibitory activity toward ATP binding cassette transporters involved in multi‐drug resistance, such as BCRP and MRP1, by using tumor cell lines overexpressing each transporter. These SAR studies are a significant step toward improving the inhibitory potency against P‐glycoprotein, BCRP, and MRP1.magnified image2‐Aryloxazole and 2‐arylthiazole derivatives were evaluated for their inhibitory activity toward P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp) as well as their selectivity toward other ABC transporters involved in multi‐drug resistance such as BCRP and MRP1. These derivatives have 6,7‐dimethoxytetrahydroisoquinoline or cyclohexylpiperazine moieties, which are the same basic nuclei of the potent P‐gp inhibitors MC70 (EC50=0.05 μM) and PB28 (EC50=0.55 μM), respectively. The results demonstrate that 2‐aryloxazole and 2‐arylthiazole derivatives, planned as cycloisosteres of MC70, were found to be less potent than the reference compound in inhibiting P‐gp. These compounds were evaluated for their BCRP and MRP1 inhibitory activities. In particular, 6,7‐dimethoxytetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives, unsubstituted, 3‐Br, 3‐Cl, and 3‐OCH3 2‐aryloxalzole derivatives showed the best BCRP inhibitory activity (EC50 range: 0.24–0.46 μM). In contrast, all cyclohexylpiperazine derivatives except one (EC50=0.56 μM), showed decreased BCRP inhibitory activity. All compounds tested were unable to inhibit the MRP1 pump, with the exception of the 2‐OCH3 and 4‐OCH3 derivatives of the 6,7‐dimethoxytetrahydroisoquinoline series, which displayed high MRP1 inhibitory activity (EC50=0.84 and 0.90 μM, respectively).
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (36)
CITATIONS (49)