Are traditional screening tools adequate for monitoring the nutrition risk of in‐hospital patients? An analysis of the nutritionDay database
Adult
2. Zero hunger
Eating
0303 health sciences
03 medical and health sciences
Cross-Sectional Studies
Malnutrition
Humans
Nutritional Status
Hospitals
3. Good health
DOI:
10.1002/jpen.2085
Publication Date:
2021-02-08T21:10:36Z
AUTHORS (14)
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background Monitoring of adequate food intake is not a priority in hospital patients' care. The present study aimed to examine selective data from the nutritionDay survey determine impact during hospitalization on outcomes according nutrition risk status. Methods We conducted descriptive analysis selected 7 consecutive, annual, and cross‐sectional samples 2009 2015. was assessed by univariate multivariate Cox models controlling for PANDORA scores. Results A total 7994 adult patients Colombia, 7243 9 Latin American countries, 155,524 worldwid were included. Less than half worldwide consumed their entire meal (41%). number reduced eaters larger “no group” “nutrition (30% vs 25%). Reduced eating associated with higher mortality delayed discharge patients, regardless Patients without at screening who ate “nothing, but allowed eat” had 6 times more (hazard ratio, 6.48; 95% CI, 3.5311.87). Conclusions This first large‐scale evaluating relationship clinical showing an increase in‐hospital rates reduction probability being discharged home Traditional tools may identify group will become because while hospital.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (28)
CITATIONS (1)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....