Ibero‐Panamerican Federation of Periodontics Delphi study on the trends in diagnosis and treatment of peri‐implant diseases and conditions: A Latin American consensus
Delphi Technique
diagnosis
FOS: Political science
Delphi
0302 clinical medicine
Delphi technique
Diagnosis
Peri-implantitis
10. No inequality
Political science
Internal medicine
Implantes dentales
3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatología
Statistics
Life Sciences
Latin Americans
3. Good health
Periodontics
Medicine
Global Oral Health and Dental Caries
Oral Surgery
Consensus conference
Consensus
Family medicine
Peri-implant Diseases
Delphi method
Odontología
FOS: Law
03 medical and health sciences
dental implants
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Health Sciences
Genetics
FOS: Mathematics
Odontología (Odontología)
Humans
Dental Implants
FOS: Clinical medicine
Dental implants
Implant
peri- implantitis
Peri-Implantitis
Computer science
Operating system
Latin America
Dental Implantology and Peri-implant Diseases
consensus
Genetic and Environmental Influences on Cleft Lip and Palate
FOS: Biological sciences
Dentistry
Surgery
Law
Mathematics
DOI:
10.1002/jper.21-0086
Publication Date:
2021-04-15T01:18:34Z
AUTHORS (22)
ABSTRACT
AbstractBackgroundThe social diversity, heterogeneous culture, and inherent economic inequality factors in Latin America (LA) justify conducting a comprehensive analysis on the current status and future trends of peri‐implant diseases and conditions. Thus, the aim of this Delphi study was to predict the future trends in the diagnosis and treatment of peri‐implant diseases and conditions in LA countries for the year 2030.MethodsA Latin American steering committee and group of experts in implant dentistry validated a questionnaire including 64 questions divided into eight sections. The questionnaire was run twice with an interval of 45 days, with the results from the first round made available to all the participants in the second round. The results were expressed in percentages and data was analyzed describing the consensus level reached in each question.ResultsA total of 221 experts were invited to participate in the study and a total 214 (96.8%) completed the two rounds. Moderate (65%‐85%) to high consensus (≥ 85%) was reached in 51 questions (79.69%), except in the questions dealing with “prevalence”, where no consensus was reached. High and moderate consensus was attained for all the questions in three fields (risk factors and indicators, diagnosis and treatment of peri‐implant conditions and deficiencies, and prevention and maintenance).ConclusionsThe present study has provided relevant and useful information on the predictions in the diagnosis and treatment of peri‐implant diseases with a high level of consensus among experts. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of agreement in certain domains.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (50)
CITATIONS (6)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....