Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial

connective tissue graft(s) Gingiva Esthetics, Dental gingival recession 3. Good health 03 medical and health sciences Treatment Outcome 0302 clinical medicine Connective Tissue 616 cosmetic periodontal plastic surgery Humans Gingival Recession Collagen Tooth Root
DOI: 10.1002/jper.21-0212 Publication Date: 2021-10-01T21:31:05Z
ABSTRACT
AbstractBackgroundXenogeneic matrices (XMs) have been increasingly used for root coverage procedures. This study compared the use of two types of XM (collagen matrix [CM] and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix [XDM]) associated with the coronally advanced flap technique (CAF) to treat single gingival recessions.MethodsSeventy‐five patients presenting single RT1 gingival recession were treated by CAF (control group, n = 25), CAF+CM (test group 1, n = 25), or CAF+XDM (test group 2, n = 25) and completed 6‐month follow‐up. Clinical, patient‐centered, and esthetic assessments were performed and intra‐ and intergroup differences were analyzed.ResultsAt 6 months, the mean recession reduction for CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM was 2.4 ± 0.8 mm, 2.4 ± 0.9 mm and 2.1 ± 0.8 mm, respectively (P > 0.05). The corresponding mean percentage of root coverage was 78.9% ± 26.2% for CAF, 78.0% ± 28.5% for CAF+CM, and 65.6% ± 26.9% for CAF+XDM (P > 0.05). Dentin hypersensitivity and esthetic conditions showed significantly improvements in all groups. Test groups presented significant gains in gingival thickness (GT; CAF+CM: 0.4 ± 0.3 mm; CAF+XDM: 0.4 ± 0.2 mm) compared to the control group (CAF: 0.0 ± 0.1 mm; P < 0.05).ConclusionThe CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM treatments each provided similar results in the treatment of single gingival recessions. The addition of either CM or XDM to CAF increases the GT.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (47)
CITATIONS (14)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....