Optical genome mapping identifies a germline retrotransposon insertion in SMARCB1 in two siblings with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors
0301 basic medicine
Retroelements
rhabdoid tumors
SMARCB1
optical imaging
03 medical and health sciences
Journal Article
Humans
Internal Medicine - Radboud University Medical Center
Germ-Line Mutation
Rhabdoid Tumor
Radboudumc 4: lnfectious Diseases and Global Health RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences
Radboudumc 7: Neurodevelopmental disorders DCMN: Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Siblings
retrotransposon
Pathology - Radboud University Medical Center
Infant, Newborn
Teratoma
Chromosome Mapping
Radboudumc 3: Disorders of movement DCMN: Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience
SMARCB1 Protein
Original Papers
Radboudumc 17: Women's cancers RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences
3. Good health
Radboudumc 14: Tumours of the digestive tract RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences
childhood cancer predisposition
Human Genetics - Radboud University Medical Center
Female
Radboudumc 0: Other Research RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences
DOI:
10.1002/path.5755
Publication Date:
2021-07-07T05:49:19Z
AUTHORS (20)
ABSTRACT
AbstractIn a subset of pediatric cancers, a germline cancer predisposition is highly suspected based on clinical and pathological findings, but genetic evidence is lacking, which hampers genetic counseling and predictive testing in the families involved. We describe a family with two siblings born from healthy parents who were both neonatally diagnosed with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT). This rare and aggressive pediatric tumor is associated with biallelic inactivation of SMARCB1, and in 30% of the cases, a predisposing germline mutation is involved. Whereas the tumors of both siblings showed loss of expression of SMARCB1 and acquired homozygosity of the locus, whole exome and whole genome sequencing failed to identify germline or somatic SMARCB1 pathogenic mutations. We therefore hypothesized that the insertion of a pathogenic repeat‐rich structure might hamper its detection, and we performed optical genome mapping (OGM) as an alternative strategy to identify structural variation in this locus. Using this approach, an insertion of ~2.8 kb within intron 2 of SMARCB1 was detected. Long‐range PCR covering this region remained unsuccessful, but PacBio HiFi genome sequencing identified this insertion to be a SINE‐VNTR‐Alu, subfamily E (SVA‐E) retrotransposon element, which was present in a mosaic state in the mother. This SVA‐E insertion disrupts correct splicing of the gene, resulting in loss of a functional allele. This case demonstrates the power of OGM and long‐read sequencing to identify genomic variations in high‐risk cancer‐predisposing genes that are refractory to detection with standard techniques, thereby completing the clinical and molecular diagnosis of such complex cases and greatly improving counseling and surveillance of the families involved. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (59)
CITATIONS (38)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....