The mixed model for the analysis of a repeated‐measurement multivariate count data
Dirichlet-multinomial
Statistics and Probability
Models, Statistical
Epidemiology
Microbiota
overdispersion
microbiome
01 natural sciences
multivariate
conditional model
count
generalized linear mixed model
Multivariate Analysis
conditional model; count; Dirichlet-multinomial; generalized linear mixed model; microbiome; multivariate; overdispersion
Journal Article
Humans
Regression Analysis
Computer Simulation
0101 mathematics
Research Articles
DOI:
10.1002/sim.8101
Publication Date:
2019-02-14T07:10:55Z
AUTHORS (5)
ABSTRACT
Clustered overdispersed multivariate count data are challenging to model due to the presence of correlation within and between samples. Typically, the first source of correlation needs to be addressed but its quantification is of less interest. Here, we focus on the correlation between time points. In addition, the effects of covariates on the multivariate counts distribution need to be assessed. To fulfill these requirements, a regression model based on the Dirichlet‐multinomial distribution for association between covariates and the categorical counts is extended by using random effects to deal with the additional clustering. This model is the Dirichlet‐multinomial mixed regression model. Alternatively, a negative binomial regression mixed model can be deployed where the corresponding likelihood is conditioned on the total count. It appears that these two approaches are equivalent when the total count is fixed and independent of the random effects. We consider both subject‐specific and categorical‐specific random effects. However, the latter has a larger computational burden when the number of categories increases. Our work is motivated by microbiome data sets obtained by sequencing of the amplicon of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. These data have a compositional structure and are typically overdispersed. The microbiome data set is from an epidemiological study carried out in a helminth‐endemic area in Indonesia. The conclusions are as follows: time has no statistically significant effect on microbiome composition, the correlation between subjects is statistically significant, and treatment has a significant effect on the microbiome composition only in infected subjects who remained infected.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (25)
CITATIONS (18)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....