Conservative or liberal oxygen targets in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Male Adult Original Shock, Cardiogenic 610 Middle Aged Heart Arrest Oxygen Intensive Care Units Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Oxygen Saturation 617 Humans Female Registries Aged
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07564-8 Publication Date: 2024-08-20T12:02:22Z
AUTHORS (108)
ABSTRACT
Patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) frequently develop arterial hyperoxaemia, which may be harmful. However, lower oxygen saturation targets also lead to harmful episodes of hypoxaemia. In this registry-embedded, multicentre trial, we randomly assigned adult patients VA-ECMO in an intensive care unit (ICU) either a conservative (target SaO2 92–96%) or liberal strategy 97–100%) through controlled administration via the ventilator and ECMO gas blender. The primary outcome was number ICU-free days day 28. Secondary outcomes included 60, mortality, ventilation duration, ICU hospital lengths stay, functional at 6 months. From September 2019 June 2023, 934 who received were reported EXCEL registry, whom 300 (192 cardiogenic shock, 108 refractory cardiac arrest) recruited. We randomised 149 151 strategy. median 28 similar both groups (conservative: 0 [interquartile range (IQR) 0–13.7] versus liberal: [IQR 0–13.7], treatment effect: [95% confidence interval (CI) – 3.1 3.1]). Mortality (59/159 [39.6%] vs 59/151 [39.1%]) 60 (64/149 [43%] 62/151 [41.1%] groups, as all other secondary adverse events. group experienced 44 (29.5%) major protocol deviations compared 2 (1.3%) (P < 0.001). adults ICU, strategy, did not affect
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (35)
CITATIONS (6)