ESSD–ESGAR best practice position statements on the technical performance of videofluoroscopic swallowing studies in adult patients with swallowing disorders

• DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11241-1
• Publication Date: 2024-12-05T12:27:42Z
• Authors: Martina Scharitzer; Wolfgang Schima; Margaret Walshe; Eric Verin; Stefano Doratiotto; Olle Ekberg; Daniele Farneti; Peter Pokieser; Emilio Quaia; Virginie Woisard; Ekaterini Xinou; Renée Speyer
• Keywords: [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]; 610; Dysphagia; Consensus development; Deglutition disorders; [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences; [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]; 0302 clinical medicine; Barium; Fluoroscopy; 616; Barium; Consensus development; Deglutition disorders; Dysphagia; Fluoroscopy; [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences

Abstract

Objectives Videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) remain the gold standard for the instrumental assessment of oropharyngeal swallowing disorders alongside flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), requiring a high standard of quality and correct implementation. The current best practice position statements aim to guide the clinical practice of VFSS in individuals experiencing swallowing disorders.

Materials and methods An international expert consensus panel with expertise in oropharyngeal dysphagia, comprised of radiologists, speech-language therapists, otolaryngologists, and other professionals in the field, convened by the European Society of Swallowing Disorders (ESSD) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), developed best practice position statements. They were established using an online Delphi methodology involving an online panel discussion and item preparation and three consecutive rounds. Consensus was reached when ≥ 80% of the participants agreed on a specific recommendation.

Results Eighteen best practice position statements were formulated, thereby establishing standard recommendations on the technical performance of VFSS. They cover VFSS planning, correct implementation, documentation, radiation protection, equipment and maintenance, and education and training.

Conclusion These position statements summarise the panel’s deliberations and recommendations in performing VFSS, representing the agreed consensus of experts from ESSD and ESGAR. They provide a structured framework for optimising and standardising the performance of VFSS in patients with swallowing disorders.

Key Points

Question

Significant regional and national differences in clinical practice when performing VFSS highlight the need for interdisciplinary recommendations to optimise patient care.

Findings

Eighteen statements were developed by representatives of the ESSD and the ESGAR.

Clinical relevance

These best practice position statements on the technical performance of VFSS may serve as a basis for standardising the procedure and ensuring high-quality service.