Paclitaxel drug-coated balloon-only angioplasty for de novo coronary artery disease in elective clinical practice

• DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-02106-y
• Publication Date: 2022-09-14T17:03:33Z
• Authors: Ioannis Merinopoulos; Tharusha Gunawardena; Natasha Corballis; U Bhalraam; Tim Gilbert; Clint Maart; Paul Richardson; Alisdair Ryding; Toomas Sarev; Chris Sawh; Sreekumar Sulfi; Upul Wickramarachchi; Trevor Wistow; Mohamed O. Mohamed; Mamas A. Mamas; Vassilios S. Vass...; Simon C. Eccleshall
• Keywords: Original Paper; Paclitaxel; 610; Drug-Eluting Stents; Coronary Artery Disease; 3. Good health; Coronary Restenosis; 03 medical and health sciences; Treatment Outcome; 0302 clinical medicine; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Humans; Angina, Stable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary

Abstract Objective We aimed to investigate the safety of drug-coated balloon (DCB)-only angioplasty compared to drug-eluting stent (DES), as part of routine clinical practice.

Background The recent BASKETSMALL2 trial demonstrated the safety and efficacy of DCB angioplasty for de novo small vessel disease. Registry data have also demonstrated that DCB angioplasty is safe; however, most of these studies are limited due to long recruitment time and a small number of patients with DCB compared to DES. Therefore, it is unclear if DCB-only strategy is safe to incorporate in routine elective clinical practice.

Methods We compared all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular endpoints (MACE), including unplanned target lesion revascularisation (TLR) of all patients treated with DCB or DES for first presentation of stable angina due to de novo coronary artery disease between 1st January 2015 and 15th November 2019. Data were analysed with Cox regression models and cumulative hazard plots.

Results We present 1237 patients; 544 treated with DCB and 693 treated with DES for de novo, mainly large-vessel coronary artery disease. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, only age and frailty remained significant adverse predictors of all-cause mortality. Univariable, cumulative hazard plots showed no difference between DCB and DES for either all-cause mortality or any of the major cardiovascular endpoints, including unplanned TLR. The results remained unchanged following propensity score-matched analysis.

Conclusion DCB-only angioplasty, for stable angina and predominantly large vessels, is safe compared to DES as part of routine clinical practice, in terms of all-cause mortality and MACE, including unplanned TLR.

Graphic abstract