The lateralization and distalization index is more reliable than angular radiographic measurements in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

• DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05448-6
• Publication Date: 2024-07-15T04:01:39Z
• Authors: Ahmet Emin Okutan; Serkan Surucu; Hubert Laprus; Patric Raiss
• Keywords: Male; Shoulder Joint; Reproducibility of Results; Shoulder Prosthesis; Middle Aged; Orthopaedic Surgery; 03 medical and health sciences; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; 0302 clinical medicine; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Humans; Female; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Aged

Abstract Background The lateralization shoulder angle (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA) are used to reproducibly measure lateralization and distalization after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). However, LSA and DSA may not offer a precise measurement of humeral lateralization and distalization and this relationship has not been explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of these measurements and to propose new measurement methods to estimate implant lateralization and distalization.

Methods 3D models were constructed from computed tomography (CT) scans of 30 patients using a software platform. For each patient 24 different RSA modifications were created, resulting in 720 different RSA configurations. For each configuration LSA and DSA angles as well as lateralization and distalization distances were measured. Moreover, for each configuration two new measurements were done: the lateralization index (LI) and distalization index (DI). Correlations of the lateralization and distalization parameters were evaluated between measurements.

Results Weak correlations were founded between LSA and lateralization (r = 0.36, p < 0.01), whereas moderate correlations were observed between LI and lateralization (r = 0.72, p < 0.01). No significant correlations were found between DSA and distalization (r = 0.17, p = 0.113). In contrast, moderate correlations were identified between DI and distalization (r = 0.69, p < 0.01).

Conclusion LI and DI are more reliable methods to estimate implant lateralization and distalization compared to angular radiographic measurements. However, the prognostic significance in predicting clinical outcomes after RSA remains unknown.