Acute cholecystitis management at a tertiary care center: are we following current guidelines?

• DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03510-w
• Publication Date: 2024-10-24T06:03:13Z
• Authors: Andrea Spota; Amir Hassanpour; Eran Shlomovitz; David Gomez; Eisar Al-Sukhni
• Keywords: Tertiary Care Centers; Male; Aged, 80 and over; Adult; Cholecystitis, Acute; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Female; Cholecystectomy; Guideline Adherence; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Aged

Abstract Purpose After the Tokyo 2018 guidelines (TG2018) were published, evidence from the 2018 CHOCOLATE RCT supported early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (AC), even in high-risk patients. This study aims to investigate AC management at our tertiary care center in the years following these publications. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients admitted from 2018–2023. AC severity was graded using TG2018 definitions. Comorbidities were summarized using Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and frailty using the 5-item modified Frailty Index (5mFI). Compliance with TG2018 recommendations for management strategy was investigated. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent surgery versus NOM. Subset analysis based on patients’ age, frailty, and comorbidities was performed. Results Among 642 AC patients, 57% underwent cholecystectomy and 43% NOM (22% percutaneous cholecystostomy, 21% antibiotics only). NOM patients had greater length of stay (LOS), complications, deaths, readmissions, and discharge to nursing/rehab versus surgery patients. In 70% of patients managed non-operatively, TG2018 were not followed. Patients managed non-operatively despite TG2018 were more likely to undergo delayed cholecystectomy compared to those in whom guidelines were followed (17% vs 4%). In subset analysis, healthy octogenarians were significantly less likely to be managed according to TG2018 (9.4%); patients undergoing surgery had a trend towards shorter LOS (3.1 vs 4.8 days) than those managed non-operatively but no difference in other outcomes. Conclusion Most patients undergoing NOM could potentially undergo cholecystectomy if guidelines are considered. A more objective approach to risk assessment may optimize patient selection and outcomes.