Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal Hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]

• DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1799-6
• Publication Date: 2011-07-12T17:57:19Z
• Authors: R. Bittner; M. E. Arregui; T. Bisgaard; M. Dudai; G. S. Ferzli; R. J. Fitzgibbons; R. H. Fortelny; U. Klinge; F. Kockerling; E. Kuhry; J. Kukleta; D. Lomanto; M. C. Misra; A. Montgomery; S. Morales-Conde; W. Reinpold; J. Rosenberg; S. Sauerland; C. Schug-Paß; K. Singh; M. Timoney; D. Weyhe; P. Chowbey
• Keywords: Pain, Postoperative; Evidence-Based Medicine; Premedication; 610; Endoscopy; Hernia, Inguinal; Guidelines; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Surgical Mesh; 03 medical and health sciences; Postoperative Complications; 0302 clinical medicine; Risk Factors; Thromboembolism; 616; Athletic Injuries; Preoperative Care; Secondary Prevention; Humans; Surgery; Laparoscopy; Herniorrhaphy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Chapter 4 TEP versus TAPP: which is better for the patient?Chapter 5 Laparoscopic surgery in complicated hernia: feasibility, risks, and benefits 6 Mesh size recurrence: what optimal size?Chapter 7 Selection of mesh material 8 Cutting or not cutting mesh: does it influence recurrence rate?Chapter 9 fixation modalities: there an association with acute chronic pain?Chapter 10 Risk factors prevention pain 11 Urogenital complications associated laparoscopic/endoscopic hernia repair 12 Intraperitoneal onlay (IPOM) inguinal repair-still a therapeutic option?Chapter 13 Role open preperitoneal era laparoscopic 14 Sportsman hernia-diagnosis treatment