Developing an e-learning course on the use of PRO measures in oncological practice: health care professionals’ preferences for learning content and methods

• DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06676-x
• Publication Date: 2021-11-19T10:02:40Z
• Authors: Monika Sztankay; Lisa M. Wintner; Sigrid Roggendorf; Thomas Nordhausen; Linda Dirven; Martin J. B. Taph...; Irma M. Verdonck-...; Galina Velikova; Andrew Bottomley; Dagmara Kulis; Timo Kachel; Heike Schmidt
• Keywords: Quality of life; Health Personnel; 4. Education; Medical Oncology; 3. Good health; EORTC; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Oncology; Distant learning; Patient-reported outcome measures; Implementation; Surveys and Questionnaires; Humans; Original Article; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; e-learning; Computer-Assisted Instruction

Abstract Purpose Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical routine requires knowledge and competences regarding their use. In order to facilitate implementation, an e-learning course for health care professionals (HCPs) on the utilisation of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PROMs in oncological clinical practice is being developed. This study aimed to explore future users’ educational needs regarding content and learning methods.

Methods The sequential mixed methods approach was applied. A scoping literature review informed the guideline for qualitative interviews with HCPs with diverse professional backgrounds in oncology and cancer advocates recruited using a purposive sampling strategy. An international online survey was conducted to validate the qualitative findings.

Results Between December 2019 and May 2020, 73 interviews were conducted in 9 countries resulting in 8 topic areas (Basic information on PROs in clinical routine, Benefits of PRO assessments in clinical practice, Implementation of PRO assessments in clinical routine, Setup of PRO assessments for clinical application, Interpretation of PRO data, Integration of PROs into the communication with patients, Use of PROs in clinical practice, Self-management recommendations for patients based on PROs) subsequently presented in the online survey. The online survey (open between 3 June and 19 July 2020) was completed by 233 HCPs from 33 countries. The highest preference was indicated for content on interpretation of PRO data (97%), clinical benefits of assessing PRO data (95.3%) and implementation of routine PRO data assessment (94.8%). Regarding learning methods, participants indicated a high preference for practical examples that use a mixed approach of presentation (written, audio, video and interactive).

Conclusion Educational needs for an integration of PROs in communication in clinical care and coherent implementation strategies became evident. These results inform the development of an e-learning course to support HCPs in the clinical use of EORTC PRO measures.