Outcome and prognostic factors of local recurrent rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 150 patients

Adult Male Kaplan-Meier Estimate recurrent rectal cancer 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Humans Local recurrence, PET, Rectal cancer, Surgery for local recurrence, Survival Colectomy Aged Neoplasm Staging Retrospective Studies Aged, 80 and over Rectal Neoplasms Rectal cancer, Local recurrence, Surgery for local recurrence, Survival, PET Middle Aged Prognosis Combined Modality Therapy 3. Good health Logistic Models Treatment Outcome Italy Positron-Emission Tomography Female Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1241-x Publication Date: 2014-11-14T08:57:04Z
ABSTRACT
Surgery is the only curative treatment in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and the prognostic factors of tumour-free resection margin (R0) and overall survival (OS) in LRRC.Consecutive LRRC patients observed between 1987 and 2005 in three Italian university hospitals were evaluated. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. In order to identify factors associated with both R0 resection and OS, a logistic regression analysis was performed in patients who underwent surgery with curative intent.Out of 150 patients with LRRC, 107 underwent surgery, but since 7 were found to have unresectable disease only 100 underwent surgical resection. Of them, 51 underwent radical and 49 extended resection. Sixty of the 107 patients underwent multimodality treatment. In 61 patients, R0 resection was achieved. Median OS after surgery was 43.4 months. In patients, who had surgery with curative intent, independent variables associated with R0 resection were: surgery for the primary tumour performed in other hospitals (p = 0.042) extended resection (p = 0.025) and use of positron emission tomography (PET) as a staging modality (p = 0.03). Independent variables associated with OS were: post-operative radiotherapy (p = 0.004), stage of the primary tumour (p = 0.004), R0 resection (p = 0.00001), and use of PET (0.02).Resection for LRRC results in improved survival. Other than the well-known prognostic factors R0 resection and OS, PET scan has an independent impact both on OS and R0 resection. It should therefore be included in routine clinical practice when staging LRRC.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (35)
CITATIONS (28)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....