Combining adaptive expertise and (critically) reflective practice to support the development of knowledge, skill, and society

• DOI: 10.1007/s10459-022-10178-8
• Publication Date: 2022-11-09T14:02:49Z
• Authors: Stella L Ng; Jacquelin Forsey; Victoria A Boyd; Farah Friesen; Sylvia Langlois; Kori Ladonna; Maria Mylopoulos; Naomi Steenhof
• Keywords: 03 medical and health sciences; Knowledge; 0302 clinical medicine; 4. Education; Humans; Learning; Clinical Competence; Delivery of Health Care; Article

AbstractAdaptive expertise (AE) and reflective practice (RP), two influential and resonant theories of professional expertise and practice in their own right, may further benefit health professions education if carefully combined. The current societal and systemic context is primed for both AE and RP. Both bodies of work position practitioners as agentive, learning continually and thoughtfully throughout their careers, particularly in order to manage unprecedented situations well. Similar on the surface, the roots and practices of AE and RP diverge at key junctures and we will focus on RP’s movement toward critically reflective practice. The roots of AE and RP, and how they relate to or diverge from present-day applications matter because in health professions education, as in all education, paradigmatic mixing should be undertaken purposefully. This paper will explore the need for AE and RP, their shared commitments, distinctive histories, pedagogical possibilities both individually and combined, and next steps for maximizing their potential to positively impact the field. We argue that this exploration is urgently needed because both AE and RP hold much promise for improving health care and yet employing them optimally—whether alone or together—requires understanding and intent. We build an interprofessional education case situated in long-term care, throughout the paper, to demonstrate the potential that AE and RP might offer to health professions education individually and combined. This exploration comes just in time. Within the realities of uncertain practice emphasized by the pandemic, practitioners were also called to act in response to complex and urgent social movements. A combined AE and RP approach, with focus on critically reflective practice in particular, would potentially prepare professionals to respond effectively, compassionately, and equitably to future health and social crises and challenges.