Spatial analysis of chromium in southwestern part of Iran: probabilistic health risk and multivariate global sensitivity analysis

• DOI: 10.1007/s10653-019-00260-3
• Publication Date: 2019-02-18T12:49:07Z
• Authors: Mohamad Sakizadeh; Eisa Ahmadpour; Fatemeh Mehrabi S...
• Keywords: Chromium; Spatial Analysis; Drinking Water; Environmental Exposure; Iran; Models, Biological; Risk Assessment; 01 natural sciences; 6. Clean water; 3. Good health; 13. Climate action; Humans; Groundwater; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Environmental Monitoring; 0105 earth and related environmental sciences

This study was concerned with chromium as a potential carcinogenic contaminant in 64 wells located in five aquifers, southwest of Iran. A probabilistic health risk assessment indicated a high risk to the local residents including adults and children in the study area. A sequential sensitivity analysis and a novel approach known as multivariate global sensitivity analysis using both principal component analysis and B-spline were applied to investigate the behavior of health risk model along time considering four independent input parameters in the risk equation. In this context, based on the results of sensitivity analysis, concentration of chromium in drinking water (Cw) and body weight (W) were the most influential parameters. Random forest (RF) was used as a variable selection method to choose the most influential parameters for the prediction of chromium. Five parameters, among 13 water quality variables, including phosphate, nitrate, fluoride, manganese and iron were selected by RF as the most important parameters for spatial prediction. Hybrid methods of RF and ordinary kriging (RFOK) and RF and inverse distance weighting (RFIDW) were then applied for spatial prediction of Cr using the secondary variables. The RFOK and RFIDW were more efficient than that of ordinary kriging (OK) with respect to a cross-validation algorithm. For instance, in terms of relative root mean squared error, the performance of OK was improved from 31.72 to 23.21 and 23.61 for RFOK and RFIDW, respectively.