Comparison of multiple fluid status assessment methods in patients on chronic hemodialysis

• DOI: 10.1007/s11255-016-1473-y
• Publication Date: 2016-12-10T13:18:22Z
• Authors: Giannis Alexiadis; Stelios Panagoutsos; Stefanos Roumeliotis; Ilias Stibiris; Angelos Markos; Konstantia Kantartzi; Ploumis Passadakis
• Keywords: Male; Blood Volume Determination; Vena Cava, Inferior; Middle Aged; Water-Electrolyte Balance; 3. Good health; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Body Water; ROC Curve; Renal Dialysis; Electric Impedance; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Female; Aged; Ultrasonography

Control of hydration status is an important constituent of adequate and efficient hemodialysis (HD) treatment. Nevertheless, there are no precise clinical indices for early recognition of small changes in fluid status of patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis therapy. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the widely used and reliable method of indexed inferior vena cava diameter (IVCDi) with established and more recently available techniques (bioelectrical impedance analysis [BIA], continuous blood volume monitoring [Crit-line], and the B-line score [BLS] with lung ultrasonography) for estimating the hydration status of patients on HD.Fifty-three patients undergoing chronic HD thrice weekly were included in the study. Evaluation of hydration status methods (IVCDi, BLS, BIA, and Crit-line) was performed thrice weekly before and after HD. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the discriminative power of (methods) the BLS, BIA, and Crit-line for predicting over- and underhydration of patients, as determined by the reference method, IVCDi.BLS showed the most promising results in predicting overhydration, as determined by IVCDi, compared with BIA and Crit-line and presented a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 74%. The accuracy of the BLS was higher than that of BIA (0.81 vs. 0.71, p = 0.032) and Crit-line (0.61, p = 0.001). BLS also showed more promising results in predicting underhydration, as determined by IVCDi, than BIA and Crit-line and presented a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 73%. The accuracy of the BLS was higher than that of BIA (0.83 vs. 0.76, p = 0.035) and Crit-line (0.50, p < 0.001).The BLS is a useful and easily performed technique that has recently become available for accurate evaluation of dry weight and fluid status in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing chronic HD. This method might help recognize asymptomatic lung congestion in these patients.