Preferences for Long-Acting and Alternative Modalities for PrEP among Military Men Who Have Sex with Men: Segmentation Results of an Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Study

• DOI: 10.1007/s11524-022-00615-9
• Publication Date: 2022-03-22T17:04:48Z
• Authors: Jose I. Gutierrez; David Vlahov; Alex Dubov; Frederick L. Altice
• Keywords: Male; Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities; 610; HIV Infections; Sexual and Gender Minorities (SGM/LGBT*); Patient Preferences; Article; Sexual and Gender Minorities; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Patient Preferences; Clinical Research; Health Sciences; Behavioral and Social Science; Humans; Homosexuality, Male; Conjoint analysis; Infectious disease; Public health; Prevention; Military health; Pre-exposure prophylaxis; HIV; Bayes Theorem; Homosexuality; Human Movement and Sports Sciences; PrEP; 3. Good health; Mental Health; Good Health and Well Being; Military Personnel; Decision science; Public Health and Health Services; HIV/AIDS; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Public Health; LAI-PrEP

AbstractThe use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention within the U.S. military is low. Implementing preference-based alternative modalities of PrEP delivery, however, can be an innovative strategy to address the specific barriers to PrEP uptake among military MSM. We sought to identify population-based, segment-specific preferences for longer-acting and alternative PrEP delivery modalities to guide patient-centered strategies to optimize uptake within military-serving healthcare systems. HIV-negative military men who have sex with men (MSM) completed an anonymous, adaptive choice-based conjoint (ACBC) analysis survey consisting of five key attributes of interest (dosing method, provider type, visit location, lab work evaluation location, and dispensing venue). Relative importance and part-worth utility scores were generated using Hierarchical Bayes (HB) estimation, and cluster ensemble analysis grouped participants into “phenotype” segments by preference similarity. The randomized first-choice model was then used to examine changes in program interest rates among segments through market simulation. The 429 participants were segmented into five preference groups. The dosing method attribute was found to be the most important to nearly all segments. Simulations revealed that PrEP program interest among two segments with low interest levels increased when smartphone, civilian-based, and long-acting injectable PrEP options were involved. Findings also suggested a need for clinics to be responsive and sensitive to sexual practices, risk perception, and functional PrEP knowledge. Responsiveness to segment-specific preferences in the design of military PrEP programs and acting on the importance of clinical relationships within the context of PrEP engagement within a military setting may contribute to increasing PrEP uptake.