Health-Economic Evaluation of the German Osteoporotic Fracture Prevention Program in Rural Areas (OFRA): Mobility and Falls Prevention Classes, Examination of Bone Health, and Consultation on Safety in the Living Environment
Male
Frailty
Prevention
Net-benefit approach
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Medical and Health Sciences
3. Good health
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Bone Density
Humans
Cost-effectiveness
Female
Fragility fractures
Referral and Consultation
Osteoporotic Fractures
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610
Original Research
Aged
DOI:
10.1007/s11606-022-07691-2
Publication Date:
2022-07-25T17:04:05Z
AUTHORS (6)
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background Fragility fractures are one of the leading causes disability in older adults. Yet, evidence for effectiveness and cost-effectiveness preventive approaches combining bone health fall prevention is rare. Objective To conduct a health-economic evaluation German osteoporotic fracture program rural areas (OFRA). Design Secondary cluster–randomized intervention study based on routine data. Participants All districts five federal states Germany were cluster-randomized as or control districts. OFRA was offered to community-living (a) women aged 75–79 years (b) men 70–84 with prior fragility Individuals who meet these criteria assigned group. Intervention comprised mobility falls classes, examination by density measurement, consultation safety home living environment. Main Measures We measured health-care costs terms time death within 1 year after initial contact, insurance claims Implementation recorded performers. calculated an incremental ratio (ICER) employed net-benefit approach construct acceptability curve (CEAC). Key Results There 9408 individuals group 27,318 Mean (difference: 0.82 days) 111.73€, p < .01) reduced, but mean 260.10€) increased total 148.37€, .001) The ICER per fracture-free survival 66,094.63€. CEAC showed no acceptable probability at reasonable willingness pay. Conclusion reduced rates fractures, had high implementation costs, resulting unfavorable ICER. may improve longer follow-up.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (25)
CITATIONS (3)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....