Radiology smartphone applications; current provision and cautions

• DOI: 10.1007/s13244-013-0274-4
• Publication Date: 2013-08-03T10:41:14Z
• Authors: M. A. Rodrigues; A. Visvanathan; J. T. Murchison; R. R. Brady
• Keywords: DICOM; Neuroradiology; Interventional radiology

Medical smartphone applications are increasingly popular amongst doctors. However, the quality of their content is variable. We assessed contemporary radiology-related applications, focussing on level advertised medical involvement in application development.Six major stores were searched between 18-30 June 2012 using terms radiology, radiation, x-ray(s), computed tomography/CT, magnetic resonance imaging/MRI, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, fluoroscopy and mammography/mammogram. Application ratings, cost input development recorded.321 identified. One hundred fifty-eight "teaching" 96 "reference". Three 29 DICOM viewing had FDA approval for primary diagnosis, while 62 % stated they should not be used diagnosis; 24 named professional involvement, 12 unnamed 4 acknowledged guidelines or papers; 42 did disclose authorship.A large variety available with many potential benefits. Advertised design variable, making assessment accuracy difficult prior to purchase. Additional measures required ensure such applications. The limitations image interpretation smartphones a drawback Further research into diagnosis needed.• A radiology benefits • Variable limits before purchase Limitations work these needed.